Merge pull request #929 from xFier/namelayer-primary-owner-chat-label

Fix an inconsistency in how primary ownership of namelayer groups is surfaced.
This commit is contained in:
okx-code
2026-06-19 23:38:29 +01:00
committed by GitHub
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ public class ListGroups extends BaseCommandMiddle {
for (int x = first; x < first + 10 && x < groups.size(); x++) { for (int x = first; x < first + 10 && x < groups.size(); x++) {
Group g = GroupManager.getGroup(groups.get(x)); Group g = GroupManager.getGroup(groups.get(x));
sb.append(String.format("%s : (%s)\n", sb.append(String.format("%s : (%s)\n",
g.getName(), g.getPlayerType(uuid).toString())); g.getName(), g.isOwner(uuid) ? "PRIMARY_OWNER" : g.getPlayerType(uuid).toString()));
} }
} }
sender.sendMessage(sb.toString()); sender.sendMessage(sb.toString());

View File

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ public class ListMembers extends BaseCommandMiddle {
for (UUID uu : uuids) { for (UUID uu : uuids) {
sb.append(NameLayerAPI.getCurrentName(uu)); sb.append(NameLayerAPI.getCurrentName(uu));
sb.append(" ("); sb.append(" (");
sb.append(group.getPlayerType(uu)); sb.append(group.isOwner(uu) ? "PRIMARY_OWNER" : group.getPlayerType(uu));
sb.append(")\n"); sb.append(")\n");
} }